Information networks: predictive models of human and machine behaviour
Books form networks by their readers' co-buying habits. This provides information about readers: they are expected to prefer authors of their own gender, but how large is the bias, and with what consequences? In Gender homophily in online book networks (Information Sciences, 2019), I find that author gender assortativity reaches 0.50 : gender segregation is present, but not uniform: it is stronger in certain genres. Since female authors are a minority (33% of all authors), readers (likely female) with a positive bias to female authors end up reading equally from both genders; readers with a bias against female authors end up reading on median only 10-11% female authors. I gave a keynote on such intangible information networks at Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis (TMA 2022, slides). (Image: A community of books on sale on Amazon.com.)
In Learning the mechanisms of network growth (Scientific Reports, 2024) we learn which model of network growth (combinations of preferential attachment, fitness, aging) fit real-world citation networks best, and find that growth models themselves are easy to discriminate from observed dynamics, but the diagnosis of real-world citation networks is inconclusive---so citation networks are not accurately described by any of these typical models.
In Understanding Sparse Neural Networks from their topology via multipartite graph representations (Tr. Machine Learning Research, 2024) we do a topological analysis of SNNs with both linear and convolutional layers, with (i) a new input-aware Multipartite Graph Encoding (MGE), and (ii) new end-to-end topological metrics over the MGE. We show that these topological metrics are much better predictors of the accuracy drop than metrics computed from current input-agnostic single-layer encodings, and that which topological metrics are important varies at different sparsity levels and for different architectures.
I started modelling human-played games with piece captures from an ecological point of view. Here's a summary of empirical chess food webs (poster, CCS'24).